Of all of the narratives perpetuated by the conservative media machine, the most damaging (and mystifying) has got to be that liberals and Democrats don't care about the "little guy," the working class. When it comes to policy record, it couldn't be clearer that massive corporate interests are in the driver's seat in conservative circles, yet somehow the working class narrative sticks. How did we get here? How do we set the record straight? I have a few ideas.
1. The "Spectator-ization" of the American Electorate
There are a lot of different ways to be involved in policy-making. Running for office is just one (and the most specialized) way. During the 20th century, being a union member was the best way for individual Americans to be directly involved in influencing policy that affected them. It was real, it was concrete to observe conditions in the workplace, hiring and firing practices, and, of course, wages, and to say "this isn't right." Unions provided a direct conduit to corporate leaders and, importantly, the political structure, to address grievances and improve conditions. More often than not, unions found friends in the Democrat party.
But things have changed. Union memberships are down significantly (about 33%) across the country. And, in their decline, corporate interests have been able to pass right-to-work laws across 28 states. Not surprisingly, these are "Red states" where the pro-business Republicans were only too happy to ingratiate themselves to their benefactors.
The result of this trend has been to make politics and policy less relevant to individual Americans. They have become spectators to a process they used to help shape. And, with that, has come the hollowing out of the core participating base of the Democrat party.
Enter: Citizens United. Corporate interests didn't stop by disenfranchising tens of millions of voters from direct participation in the democratic process (not elections - the democratic process of governing). They wanted even more influence. And that means buying it. Election after election, the spending totals spiral more and more out of reach of ordinary Americans.
We now consume politics through cable news, rather than our daily life. We are spectators, watching so-called "elites" take all the power and money and making all the decisions. And, with each iteration of the cycle, the Republican/Corporate machine sinks its claws in deeper. And, likewise, wage inequality gets worse and worse.
2. The False Conservative Narrative
If conditions have materially worsened during the progress of the Corporate-Republican march, how is it that the average American hasn't turned away? Well, once direct participation through union membership waned, they were able to re-shape the narrative and, in so doing, invent new narratives to keep people focused on other villains. And their villains of choice? Globalization and Immigration. It's worked beautifully. Ask almost any conservative voter and they will tell you the reason their pay and benefits stink are because of one or both of those two factors. Heck, ask many liberal voters and you'll probably hear something similar. "Those people" are taking our jobs and doing it for cheap. And who is going to tell you any different? Who has direct, first-hand knowledge of what goes on behind closed doors? Too few.
3. Very Real Change
As powerful as the decline of unions and a strong narrative have been, the Corporate/Republican machine didn't orchestrate the whole thing. The last twenty years have powerfully and irreversibly transformed the drivers of our economy at a scale that hasn't been seen since the Industrial Revolution. And we haven't kept up. 20th century institutions that built this nation (like coal and internal combustion vehicles) are waning. And, like a drowning man, they are determined to grab onto anything or anyone, no matter the consequences, to stay afloat. The real victims in all of that climate of denial have been the men and women employed by those industries. With no advocates to ensure a transition, people are left to fend for themselves. I don't care how you vote, that kind of existential threat to your ability to feed your family is scary as hell. And that kind of desperation has led to extreme factions on the left and right.
A New Promise
The DNC has unveiled their new message. They call it "A Better Deal." Nobody asked me or I would have told them that "Promise 21" would have been better branding, but I digress. The point is, it's time to acknowledge the set of factors that got us here, what we are facing, and remind people who actually is trying to put policy and protection in place that serves and protects the American Worker.
I don't know if labor unions will bounce back. I don't know if they should in this new landscape. But whether they do or not, people need to come back to politics. They need to show up at party meetings and shape the conversation. They need to see that they have a voice in the process and an advocate in the Democrat Party. Because getting improved conditions, wages, and support for every American worker is not a spectator sport. It doesn't filter down from the "elites" at the top. It starts at the bottom. And, as we look to the next wave of prosperity leading us into a new and transformed American economy, we need to make sure that working people have a voice and a seat at the table.
Because, at the end of the day, do you want someone representing you who took tens of thousands of dollars from companies with an axe to grind, or do you want that person to be accountable to you?
Showing posts with label employment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label employment. Show all posts
Tuesday, August 8, 2017
Friday, March 17, 2017
Liberal America's "Entitlement Problem"
Go ahead and do a Google search for Liberals and Entitlements. I'll wait....
Did you get it? Not pretty, is it? Apparently we liberals just LOVE to give away the store to all those lazy, fraudulent, and whiny people out there who just won't work for themselves. Which, obviously, is why we liberals also LOVE taxes. Okay, I fess up; you got me. I just thrive on laziness, fraud, and taxes.
What a crock! I mean, what an absolute, steaming pile of myth!
First of all, there's the word: Entitlements. In conservative parlance, they take it to mean "free stuff" or, worse, "freeloading". But an entitlement is, by definition, something you earned. Social Security and Medicare are programs we all pay for. 7.6% of every single paycheck goes to pay for these programs for your entire working life. When needed, basically, you withdraw against that balance. I'm pretty sure every American feels like they are owed (or entitled, if you will) a part of those benefits when the time comes.
For the record, these programs alone comprise half of the federal budget. And there isn't one politician out there willing to jump on the third rail of Social Security reform. No other program, including Defense, comes close.
The conservative rant against so-called (but mis-named) entitlements seems to focus on a few specific programs: unemployment, welfare, and food stamps (SNAP). These are the punching bags of the "laziness narrative". Conservative forces want you to think of a fat, lazy alcoholic sitting on his porch, eating Pringles and drinking a beer on your dime while you work your butt off. This fictional sloth slaps on a phony back brace every time he waddles out to collect his next check and laughs all the way to the bank. I'm sure there are a few of these characters out there, but that's not what most welfare recipients look like.
What's really interesting is those same interests that like to attack these low-income assistance programs are also the ones that are fighting tooth and nail to keep the minimum wage where it is. If you want to look at assistance programs, wages HAVE to be a part of the conversation.
Here in Arizona, the living wage for a household of three where both parents work is about $52k per year. And living wage ain't "living large". That's enough for a basic apartment and a reliable used car that you both share (which is fun when you both work). The MEDIAN wage in Arizona is $51k. You're reading that right. At least half of the people living here earn less than the minimum needed to sustain a basic normal lifestyle. Quite a few make a LOT less. And minimum wage (which we FINALLY passed a measure to increase) doesn't come close to cutting it.
What's you're point, Mike?
Just this: If you're going to talk about limiting assistance programs, then you HAVE to talk about wages. People work to support themselves and their families. If you don't pay people enough to do that, then they are going to need help. Period. The math simply doesn't add up any other way. And that is to say NOTHING of the need for people to save for retirement, their kids' education, and just everyday emergencies that hit us all. 46% of Americans can't absorb a $500 hit to their budget on any given month! 70% have less than $1,000 in the bank.
Free markets can't be "empathy free." And individual responsibility can't be "sucks to be you." We are more than a governmental system. We are more than a capitalist system. We are a society of citizens. There is one thing we are all entitled to: the simple dignity of a means to survive. It's time for the conservative think-tanks, Super-PACs, and bumper sticker factories to put up or shut up.
Did you get it? Not pretty, is it? Apparently we liberals just LOVE to give away the store to all those lazy, fraudulent, and whiny people out there who just won't work for themselves. Which, obviously, is why we liberals also LOVE taxes. Okay, I fess up; you got me. I just thrive on laziness, fraud, and taxes.
What a crock! I mean, what an absolute, steaming pile of myth!
First of all, there's the word: Entitlements. In conservative parlance, they take it to mean "free stuff" or, worse, "freeloading". But an entitlement is, by definition, something you earned. Social Security and Medicare are programs we all pay for. 7.6% of every single paycheck goes to pay for these programs for your entire working life. When needed, basically, you withdraw against that balance. I'm pretty sure every American feels like they are owed (or entitled, if you will) a part of those benefits when the time comes.
For the record, these programs alone comprise half of the federal budget. And there isn't one politician out there willing to jump on the third rail of Social Security reform. No other program, including Defense, comes close.
The conservative rant against so-called (but mis-named) entitlements seems to focus on a few specific programs: unemployment, welfare, and food stamps (SNAP). These are the punching bags of the "laziness narrative". Conservative forces want you to think of a fat, lazy alcoholic sitting on his porch, eating Pringles and drinking a beer on your dime while you work your butt off. This fictional sloth slaps on a phony back brace every time he waddles out to collect his next check and laughs all the way to the bank. I'm sure there are a few of these characters out there, but that's not what most welfare recipients look like.
What's really interesting is those same interests that like to attack these low-income assistance programs are also the ones that are fighting tooth and nail to keep the minimum wage where it is. If you want to look at assistance programs, wages HAVE to be a part of the conversation.
Here in Arizona, the living wage for a household of three where both parents work is about $52k per year. And living wage ain't "living large". That's enough for a basic apartment and a reliable used car that you both share (which is fun when you both work). The MEDIAN wage in Arizona is $51k. You're reading that right. At least half of the people living here earn less than the minimum needed to sustain a basic normal lifestyle. Quite a few make a LOT less. And minimum wage (which we FINALLY passed a measure to increase) doesn't come close to cutting it.
What's you're point, Mike?
Just this: If you're going to talk about limiting assistance programs, then you HAVE to talk about wages. People work to support themselves and their families. If you don't pay people enough to do that, then they are going to need help. Period. The math simply doesn't add up any other way. And that is to say NOTHING of the need for people to save for retirement, their kids' education, and just everyday emergencies that hit us all. 46% of Americans can't absorb a $500 hit to their budget on any given month! 70% have less than $1,000 in the bank.
"There is one thing we are all entitled to: the simple dignity of a means to survive."
Free markets can't be "empathy free." And individual responsibility can't be "sucks to be you." We are more than a governmental system. We are more than a capitalist system. We are a society of citizens. There is one thing we are all entitled to: the simple dignity of a means to survive. It's time for the conservative think-tanks, Super-PACs, and bumper sticker factories to put up or shut up.
Thursday, March 2, 2017
Change, Fear, and the Myth of the Zero Sum
The conservative machine loves to call liberals "snowflakes" and "cry babies". For some reason the belief is that we are scared of our own shadows, likely to melt in the sun. But if you look at the politics of the left as compared to the right, it sure seems to me that the opposite is more likely the truth. Based on the policies they are championing: CONSERVATIVES. ARE. TERRIFIED. So-called "extreme vetting," a 2,000 mile wall, getting rid of all the "bad hombres," not to mention the inexplicable fervor to send our sons and daughters back into the furnace of war to obliterate an enemy that nobody else seems to want to deal with. Everywhere you turn, the conservative media outlets are pushing a "boogey man" narrative that keeps voters coming back.
But our country IS changing. Probably at a level not seen since the industrial revolution. Our economy is transforming into the beginnings of what it will be over the next 100 years. Old industries that were once the staple of our economy are decaying. New industries are still finding their way into the mainstream economy needed to support them. All the while, our demographics are evolving with them. Baby boomers are retiring (or should be if they were able to save enough). And as that generation slowly makes its way off the stage, a multi-racial, more diverse and socially liberal generation is on the ascent. In short, the way we work, live, interact, love, and thrive is quickly changing in fundamental ways, never to return.
And, for many, those less equipped to join the new economy, to relate in a browner, more accepting nation, that's scary as hell. It feels like the country is slipping away from them. Then, add on the conservative media's constant whipping up of fear about terrorism and immigrants. You're losing your job, your neighborhood is changing, AND they're all coming to kill you??!! No wonder people run to the strong protective embrace of the right.
The narrative is a sham. Seeing new trends and new faces emerging around you doesn't lessen your ability to thrive or pursue your own life and dreams in the same way you always have. It just means people that choose to do so differently are likely to be doing their own thing in neighborhoods like yours. And terrorism? Look, I grew up in Germany in the 70s and 80s. Lybians, the Red Army Faction, and others were setting off bombs in discotheques and on airliners. We didn't cringe in fear then; we faced them down with vigilance and determination. That was the proper response to terror.
The underlying belief making all of this change especially frightening is the idea that prosperity and fulfillment in America is a zero sum game. That, in order for some people to win, others have to lose. That's simply not the case. Sure, sometimes things play out that way. But most times, in America, there's enough prosperity to go around. We can celebrate Kwanzaa without taking away one single Christmas tree or piece of tinsel. We can recognize the right of all people to marry without lessening the value of your marriage or anyone else's. One person can make a pile of money and their next door neighbor can go out and make a different pile in a completely different way. We are not a "zero sum" nation.
The narrative of fear is not going away. It's too easy and too tempting to tap into. Watch the coverage coming out of conservative outlets and you'll see these themes play out over and over again. You can't reason with fear. You have to reject it. Face it head-on and reject the fear-baiting. And don't let anybody tell you that standing up for your beliefs (and the rights of others to live according to theirs) makes you weak.
But our country IS changing. Probably at a level not seen since the industrial revolution. Our economy is transforming into the beginnings of what it will be over the next 100 years. Old industries that were once the staple of our economy are decaying. New industries are still finding their way into the mainstream economy needed to support them. All the while, our demographics are evolving with them. Baby boomers are retiring (or should be if they were able to save enough). And as that generation slowly makes its way off the stage, a multi-racial, more diverse and socially liberal generation is on the ascent. In short, the way we work, live, interact, love, and thrive is quickly changing in fundamental ways, never to return.
And, for many, those less equipped to join the new economy, to relate in a browner, more accepting nation, that's scary as hell. It feels like the country is slipping away from them. Then, add on the conservative media's constant whipping up of fear about terrorism and immigrants. You're losing your job, your neighborhood is changing, AND they're all coming to kill you??!! No wonder people run to the strong protective embrace of the right.
The narrative is a sham. Seeing new trends and new faces emerging around you doesn't lessen your ability to thrive or pursue your own life and dreams in the same way you always have. It just means people that choose to do so differently are likely to be doing their own thing in neighborhoods like yours. And terrorism? Look, I grew up in Germany in the 70s and 80s. Lybians, the Red Army Faction, and others were setting off bombs in discotheques and on airliners. We didn't cringe in fear then; we faced them down with vigilance and determination. That was the proper response to terror.
The underlying belief making all of this change especially frightening is the idea that prosperity and fulfillment in America is a zero sum game. That, in order for some people to win, others have to lose. That's simply not the case. Sure, sometimes things play out that way. But most times, in America, there's enough prosperity to go around. We can celebrate Kwanzaa without taking away one single Christmas tree or piece of tinsel. We can recognize the right of all people to marry without lessening the value of your marriage or anyone else's. One person can make a pile of money and their next door neighbor can go out and make a different pile in a completely different way. We are not a "zero sum" nation.
The narrative of fear is not going away. It's too easy and too tempting to tap into. Watch the coverage coming out of conservative outlets and you'll see these themes play out over and over again. You can't reason with fear. You have to reject it. Face it head-on and reject the fear-baiting. And don't let anybody tell you that standing up for your beliefs (and the rights of others to live according to theirs) makes you weak.
Monday, February 20, 2017
Taking Back the Kitchen Table
By now, you've heard me assert in more than one way that old saw, "all politics is local." And in previous articles, I've discussed how the Democrat Party has abandoned local politics for the national stage. That's caused us to lose sight of the reality on the ground.
Conservative media paints a much darker picture than reality, deftly coupling financial concerns with fear-baiting tactics aimed at immigrants and terrorism, and that's energized their base in some ways that don't necessarily fit the facts. But it ain't all rosy either.
In a nutshell: liberals need to get back to the kitchen table, the heart of American life. It's ground zero for financial issues, healthcare issues, education issues, and the all-around quality of life that families are dealing with. It's where things get discussed and decided. And it looks nothing at all like the DCCC's national platform. Let's look at the lay of the land.
46% of Americans say that a $500 hit to their monthly budget would be financially disastrous. Over 70% of Americans have less than $1000 in the bank. The average American has over $130k in debt, $16,000 of it in credit cards and $28,000 in a vehicle loan. They are upside-down on their cars and homes, and perpetuating it through refinancing and extended-term loans that keep them there. (Ask me later about the damage that decades of unrestrained lifestyle marketing has done to our society.)
Meanwhile, the average American between 55-64 years old has just $100k in retirement savings (about a third have NO retirement account at all). In a post-pension economy, people haven't adapted their spending and savings practices to prepare for retirement. As a result, people have to just keep on working longer and longer. Besides being a personal strain, that stagnates the job market, too.
Two thirds of Americans are clinically overweight, the precursor for a host of long-term medical conditions and a major factor toward productivity in the workplace. A third are clinically obese and are in immediate jeopardy of significant medical issues. Almost two thirds of adults are on some kind of prescription medication. Two-income families have become the norm just to stay afloat. People are tired, stressed, and feeling increasingly helpless in managing their own destinies.
If you want to be relevant in the political spectrum, you have to recognize this. You have to get back to the kitchen table. That's what our 45th President did. For whatever else you may think, he got this one right. The Republican Party OWNS the kitchen table. The big money Super PACs and think tanks don't actually care about these folks; they are simply tapping into their circumstances to further a larger pro-corporate agenda. And that's the awful irony of the whole thing.
The good news is, we are all experts! We don't need focus groups or polls. This is OUR reality. The bad news is, the Party is completely focused on Washington. We are going to drag them along with us or, potentially, leave them behind.
This is also where outreach begins. Before you ask for a vote or to post a sign or support a rally, or - heaven forbid - ask for money, offer a hand. Find out the core issues in your community and start looking at how to tackle them together. If you believe in the core liberal values of Equal Opportunity, Equal Dignity, and Equal Justice, as I do, then this is where our attention is needed most.
Conservative media paints a much darker picture than reality, deftly coupling financial concerns with fear-baiting tactics aimed at immigrants and terrorism, and that's energized their base in some ways that don't necessarily fit the facts. But it ain't all rosy either.
In a nutshell: liberals need to get back to the kitchen table, the heart of American life. It's ground zero for financial issues, healthcare issues, education issues, and the all-around quality of life that families are dealing with. It's where things get discussed and decided. And it looks nothing at all like the DCCC's national platform. Let's look at the lay of the land.
46% of Americans say that a $500 hit to their monthly budget would be financially disastrous. Over 70% of Americans have less than $1000 in the bank. The average American has over $130k in debt, $16,000 of it in credit cards and $28,000 in a vehicle loan. They are upside-down on their cars and homes, and perpetuating it through refinancing and extended-term loans that keep them there. (Ask me later about the damage that decades of unrestrained lifestyle marketing has done to our society.)
Meanwhile, the average American between 55-64 years old has just $100k in retirement savings (about a third have NO retirement account at all). In a post-pension economy, people haven't adapted their spending and savings practices to prepare for retirement. As a result, people have to just keep on working longer and longer. Besides being a personal strain, that stagnates the job market, too.
Two thirds of Americans are clinically overweight, the precursor for a host of long-term medical conditions and a major factor toward productivity in the workplace. A third are clinically obese and are in immediate jeopardy of significant medical issues. Almost two thirds of adults are on some kind of prescription medication. Two-income families have become the norm just to stay afloat. People are tired, stressed, and feeling increasingly helpless in managing their own destinies.
If you want to be relevant in the political spectrum, you have to recognize this. You have to get back to the kitchen table. That's what our 45th President did. For whatever else you may think, he got this one right. The Republican Party OWNS the kitchen table. The big money Super PACs and think tanks don't actually care about these folks; they are simply tapping into their circumstances to further a larger pro-corporate agenda. And that's the awful irony of the whole thing.
The good news is, we are all experts! We don't need focus groups or polls. This is OUR reality. The bad news is, the Party is completely focused on Washington. We are going to drag them along with us or, potentially, leave them behind.
This is also where outreach begins. Before you ask for a vote or to post a sign or support a rally, or - heaven forbid - ask for money, offer a hand. Find out the core issues in your community and start looking at how to tackle them together. If you believe in the core liberal values of Equal Opportunity, Equal Dignity, and Equal Justice, as I do, then this is where our attention is needed most.
Thursday, February 16, 2017
Why don't liberals care about jobs
Soon after the election, after the initial shock wore off, the inevitable question came from everyone's lips. "What the hell just happened?" Even supporters of our 45th President were surprised by his victory. And, pretty quickly, the conventional wisdom gelled around one theme: Jobs. Or, as Bill Clinton once put it, "It's the economy, stupid!"
Then the Monday morning quarterbacking started. "Why didn't the Democrats talk more about jobs? If only they had, we woulda won this thing." Fair question. So why didn't liberals talk about jobs? Why isn't it a prominent theme across our platform? Simple: JOBS. AREN'T. A. PROBLEM. At least, not at a national level. At unemployment less than 5%, basically everyone that wants a job has one.
Talk about the unemployment rate with a conservative for just 30 seconds, and you'll hear that old gem, "Unemployment doesn't count all the people that have stopped looking for work." It's a handy argument. It neatly undercuts the number without offering any clarity, whatsoever. So what's a liberal to do?
Instead of looking at unemployment rates, why don't we talk more about how many people are actually working? It certainly takes away the "stopped looking" argument. Is it because it's too hard to figure out? Nope. The Bureau of Labor Statistics is, true to its name, LOADED with labor statistics. Free for the accessing (unless our President decides that should be shut off too). Just take a look at this graph below, pulled today.
So there it is, in black and white (and red). This graph shows how many people had a job (other than on a farm) every month over the last 17 years. What can we learn here?
What we are left with is the cognitive dissonance created by the conservative media machine with inane and unsupported counterpoints like "well that doesn't count all the people who stopped looking for work." It's been repeated so often, along with other themes, that, in spite of the fact that the people hearing the message actually HAVE jobs (along with their friends, relatives, and neighbors), they still believe to their core that unemployment is still a problem.
Now there are states and certainly counties across America that are suffering. But those are state issues and fall at the feet of the governors in control of those states. Everybody has heard their own governor talk about how they're going to create conditions for business to come into their state. And it's at this local level that we, as liberals, need to be plugged in. We need to bring our own ideas and messages for prosperity to our cities, counties, and states. Because that's where the solution will come. Which, by the way, is where the Democrats ARE ACTUALLY FAILING. Get local. That's where things actually get fixed.
Then the Monday morning quarterbacking started. "Why didn't the Democrats talk more about jobs? If only they had, we woulda won this thing." Fair question. So why didn't liberals talk about jobs? Why isn't it a prominent theme across our platform? Simple: JOBS. AREN'T. A. PROBLEM. At least, not at a national level. At unemployment less than 5%, basically everyone that wants a job has one.
Talk about the unemployment rate with a conservative for just 30 seconds, and you'll hear that old gem, "Unemployment doesn't count all the people that have stopped looking for work." It's a handy argument. It neatly undercuts the number without offering any clarity, whatsoever. So what's a liberal to do?
Instead of looking at unemployment rates, why don't we talk more about how many people are actually working? It certainly takes away the "stopped looking" argument. Is it because it's too hard to figure out? Nope. The Bureau of Labor Statistics is, true to its name, LOADED with labor statistics. Free for the accessing (unless our President decides that should be shut off too). Just take a look at this graph below, pulled today.
![]() |
| Bureau of Labor Statistics, total non-farm employment, 2000-2016 |
- After 9/11, we had a recession. We didn't pull out of that until 2004, George W. Bush's 2nd term.
- Things looked pretty good for Bush 43 in his 2nd term.
- The housing crash hit at the end of Bush 43 and Barack Obama rolls into office during the most dramatic drop in the economy since the Depression.
- Even so, the total employment numbers didn't dip below the levels of the post-9/11 recession.
- Then, in 2010, and through the next six years, there was a steady and strong increase in the number of people working, at the same rate of recovery (look at the slopes of the lines) that Bush 43 enjoyed post 9/11.
What we are left with is the cognitive dissonance created by the conservative media machine with inane and unsupported counterpoints like "well that doesn't count all the people who stopped looking for work." It's been repeated so often, along with other themes, that, in spite of the fact that the people hearing the message actually HAVE jobs (along with their friends, relatives, and neighbors), they still believe to their core that unemployment is still a problem.
Now there are states and certainly counties across America that are suffering. But those are state issues and fall at the feet of the governors in control of those states. Everybody has heard their own governor talk about how they're going to create conditions for business to come into their state. And it's at this local level that we, as liberals, need to be plugged in. We need to bring our own ideas and messages for prosperity to our cities, counties, and states. Because that's where the solution will come. Which, by the way, is where the Democrats ARE ACTUALLY FAILING. Get local. That's where things actually get fixed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

